<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Information Technology Leaders Forum &#187; 802.11b</title>
	<atom:link href="http://itlf.org/tag/802-11b/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://itlf.org</link>
	<description>Connecting IT with your Business</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Jun 2010 00:55:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Wireless Security: Why WPA2 is better than WPA</title>
		<link>http://www.thegeekpub.com/776/why-wpa2-is-better-than-wpa/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thegeekpub.com/776/why-wpa2-is-better-than-wpa/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 17:06:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike Murray</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[IT Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[802.11a]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[802.11b]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[802.11g]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[802.11n]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[network]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wireless]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wireless security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wpa vs. wpa2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wpa2 vs. wpa]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itlf.org/?p=23</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[WPA versus 802.11i (WPA2): Your Choice Affects your Wireless Network Security WPA2 is better than WPAThis article is a discussion of why 802.11i (WPA2) provides stronger wireless security than WiFi Protected Access (WPA) and WEP, why there is a need for a new standard and...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WPA versus 802.11i (WPA2): Your Choice Affects your Wireless Network  Security</p>
<p>WPA2 is better than WPAThis article is a discussion of why 802.11i  (WPA2) provides stronger wireless security than WiFi Protected Access  (WPA) and WEP, why there is a need for a new standard and why you should  use it.</p>
<p>We&#8217;ve already looked at why WPA is better than WEP, so why have a new  802.11i security standard? Isn&#8217;t WPA good enough?</p>
<p><a href="http://itlf.org/files/2010/04/wifi_wpa2_graphic.jpg"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-24" title="wifi_wpa2_graphic" src="http://itlf.org/files/2010/04/wifi_wpa2_graphic.jpg" alt="" width="109" height="111" /></a>WPA has, rightly,  been admired as a masterpiece of retro engineering. It addresses the  weaknesses of WEP and the result is a very secure security system that  is backwardly compatible with most existing WiFi compliant equipment.  WPA is a practical solution that will provide more than adequate  security for most wireless network applications.</p>
<p>However WPA is in the end a compromise solution. It still relies on  the RC4 encryption algorithm and TKIP (Temporary Key Integrity  Protocol). Although unlikely, the possibility of new weaknesses being  discovered still exists.</p>
<p>A completely new security system, avoiding the design flaws of WEP  entirely, represents the best long term, scalable solution to wireless  LAN security. To this end the standards committee decided to design a  new security system from the ground up. This is the new 802.11i  standard, also known as WPA2 by the WiFi Alliance.</p>
<p>What is 802.11i?<br />
802.11i uses the concept of a Robust Security Network (RSN). In RSN  wireless devices need to support additional capabilities. This requires  new hardware and software drivers making a fully compliant RSN network  incompatible with existing WEP equipment. In the transitional period  both RSN and WEP equipment will be supported, (in fact WPA/TKIP was a  solution designed to make use of older equipment) but in the longer term  WEP devices will be phased out.</p>
<p>802.11i allows for various network implementations and can use TKIP,  but by default RSN uses AES (Advanced Encryption Standard) and CCMP  (Counter Mode CBC MAC Protocol) and it is this which provides for a  stronger, scalable solution.</p>
<p>What is AES/CCMP?<br />
Advanced Encryption Standard (AES) is the cipher system used by RSN. It  is the equivalent of the RC4 algorithm used by WPA. However the  encryption mechanism is much more complex and does not suffer from the  problems associated with WEP. AES is a block cipher, operating on blocks  of data 128bits long.</p>
<p>CCMP is the security protocol used by AES. It is the equivalent of  TKIP in WPA. CCMP computes a Message Integrity Check (MIC) using the  well known, and proven, Cipher Block Chaining Message Authentication  Code (CBC-MAC) method. Changing even one bit in a message produces a  totally different result.</p>
<p>One of the worst aspects of WEP was the management of the secret  keys. Many administrators found it impractical to manage keys in larger  networks. As a result WEP keys were often not changed making it easier  for hackers.</p>
<p>RSN defines a hierarchy of limited life keys, similar to TKIP.  AES/CCMP requires 512bits to accommodate all the keys, less than TKIP.</p>
<p>Also like TKIP master keys are not used directly, but are used to  derive other keys. Fortunately the administrator only needs to provide a  single master key.</p>
<p>Messages are encrypted using a secret key (128bits) and a 128bit  block of data. The encryption process is complex, but again the  administrator does not need to be aware of the intricacies of the  computations. The end result is encryption that is much harder to break  than even WPA.</p>
<p>Conclusion<br />
802.11i is by far the strongest security system for wireless networks.  The purist would argue that anything less is the equivalent of no  security at all.</p>
<p>When the 802.11i standard is ratified RSN (WPA2) compatible equipment  will begin to appear. 802.11i (WPA2) will be the most robust, scalable,  and secure solution and will appeal particularly to enterprise users  where key management and administration has been a major headache.</p>
<p>802.11i has been designed using proven technologies. Security has  been designed from scratch in full consultation with the best  cryptographers and stands every chance of being the solution that  wireless networks need. Although no security system can ever be  considered totally unbreakable, 802.11i security is a dependable  solution and seems unlikely to be breached. It suffers none of the  problems of older systems.</p>
<p>802.11i is a wireless security system that you can depend on. You can  use WPA to accommodate older equipment and as that reaches the end of  its useful life you can upgrade to a fully compliant RSN network.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thegeekpub.com/776/why-wpa2-is-better-than-wpa/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Ramifications of Insecure Wireless Networks</title>
		<link>http://www.thegeekpub.com/779/the-ramifications-of-insecure-wireless-networks/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thegeekpub.com/779/the-ramifications-of-insecure-wireless-networks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 17:03:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike Murray</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[IT Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[802.11a]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[802.11b]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[802.11g]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[802.11n]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wireless]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wireless networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wireless security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itlf.org/?p=20</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There is no doubt that wireless technology has evolved the way we communicate. With the popular 2.4 GHz frequency being unlicensed and inexpensive, people all around the world have been able to do things that were nothing short of impossible in the past. While this...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is no doubt that wireless technology has evolved the way we  communicate. With the popular 2.4 GHz frequency being unlicensed and  inexpensive, people all around the world have been able to do things  that were nothing short of impossible in the past. While this may be the  case, the same also applies to hackers; wireless technologies have  allowed them to not only penetrate the impenetrable, but also break into  personal networks with blazing speed (as in minutes and even seconds if  the wireless network&#8221;s access point [AP] is completely insecure).</p>
<p><a href="http://itlf.org/files/2010/04/wrt300n.jpg"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-21" title="wrt300n" src="http://itlf.org/files/2010/04/wrt300n.jpg" alt="" width="145" height="244" /></a>So what can happen if someone  breaks into your network? Well for starters, it acts as a gateway for  hackers to break into your system. On top of that, they can install  sniffers (which allow them to steal such things as passwords and other  sensitive information), adware, spyware, trojans, viruses, worms,  backdoors, rootkits, and other malware as well as pursue wireless  jamming attacks, encryption attacks, DoS attacks, and other various  attacks. In short, given enough time, the sky is the limit on what a  hacker could do when they get inside your AP.</p>
<p>At this point, many may say to themselves “Well, I have nothing of  value on my computer, so I don&#8221;t care if they hack into it”. This  couldn&#8221;t be any farther from the truth. If hackers compromise your  computer, they&#8221;ll turn it into something called a “zombie” (in other  words, their slave), which will do anything the hacker wants it to. This  could be anything from helping crack (or decipher) passwords, to  breaking into websites, to even breaking into other computers.</p>
<p>Here&#8221;s the kicker: if the hacker uses your computer to break into  something and gets caught, guess who faces the consequences? Well, it  was your computer that did the attacking, so it will be your fault, no  matter if you knew about the attack or not. Whether it leads to fines or  even jail time, you are stuck with a mess trying to prove that you are  innocent, all while the hacker carries on with his life and pursues more  targets.</p>
<p>Knowing about the consequences that can come from insecure AP&#8221;s,  there are many things you can do to prevent outsiders from trying to  break in. Ideally, you&#8221;ll use a “Defense in Depth” methodology, which  means setting up multiple layers of security to try and deter hackers  from breaking in. Now, some of these things discussed will not really  add much in the way of security, but it is additional security  nonetheless. Hackers love easy targets, so every layer of security you  add makes it more difficult for them to break in, and thus acts as a  deterrent. That being said, use the following security measures on your  personal AP:</p>
<ul>
<li> Hide your SSID broadcast. Your SSID is simply the name of your AP.  Without it, hackers will not know the difference between your AP and  other ones in the vicinity.</li>
<li>Change the name of your SSID. This may not sound like much but, the  name can tell a hacker a lot about your AP. Using the default name  probably means you are also using the default password, which can easily  be found on the internet.</li>
<li>Use MAC address filtering. A MAC address is simply an address burned  into each wireless card. Using this filtering means that only the  entered MAC addresses can access your AP.</li>
<li>Enable Encryption. Use the WPA or WPA2 (if available) security mode  as well as the AES algorithm. This makes it way more troublesome for  hackers to eavesdrop your communications.</li>
<li>Use both hardware and software firewalls. Chances are there is a  firewall embedded right in your AP, so make sure it is enabled as well  as firewalls on the networked computers.</li>
<li>Keep learning about new wireless security threats. Technology keeps  evolving, so it is in your best interest to research computer protection  articles and other related news sources. Invest in computer security  tools. While it is important to use layered security on your AP, it is  even more important to do the same for your computer in case the hacker  breaks through.</li>
</ul>
<p>When it comes to wireless networks, deterrence can be one of the most  powerful things working for you, providing you implement a Defense in  Depth methodology like described above. With the large amount of weak  and insecure AP&#8221;s that are live today, layered security will play a  vital role in whether or not outsiders try to break into your wireless  network. In the end, taking the time to secure your AP now could be the  difference of legal repercussions or identity theft down the road.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thegeekpub.com/779/the-ramifications-of-insecure-wireless-networks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wireless Security: Why WPA is better than WEP</title>
		<link>http://www.thegeekpub.com/773/why-wpa-is-better-than-wep/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thegeekpub.com/773/why-wpa-is-better-than-wep/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 12:09:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike Murray</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[IT Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[802.11a]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[802.11b]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[802.11g]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[802.11n]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wep]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wep vs. wpa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wireless]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wireless security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wpa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wpa vs. wep]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itlf.org/?p=26</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This article is an exploration of the reasons why WPA encryption provides stronger wireless security than WEP encryption in your wireless network What is WPA encryption? WiFi Protected Access (WPA) is a newer security standard adopted by the WiFi Alliance consortium. Adhering to WiFi compliance...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This article is an exploration of the reasons why WPA encryption  provides stronger wireless security than WEP encryption in your wireless  network</p>
<p><strong>What is WPA encryption?</strong><br />
<a href="http://itlf.org/files/2009/12/cracking-wep.png"><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-67" title="cracking-wep" src="http://itlf.org/files/2009/12/cracking-wep-300x199.png" alt="" width="300" height="199" /></a>WiFi Protected Access (WPA) is a newer security standard adopted by the  WiFi Alliance consortium. Adhering to WiFi compliance ensures  interoperability between different manufacturer&#8217;s equipment.</p>
<p>WPA delivers a higher level of security that further beyond anything  that WEP can offer and bridges the gaps between WEP and 802.11i  networks. WPA has the advantage that the firmware in older equipment may  be upgradeable, without new hardware.  This is not true for WPA2.</p>
<p><strong>How does WPA work?</strong><br />
WPA uses Temporal Key Integrity Protocol (TKIP). TKIP is designed to  allow WEP to be upgraded. This means that all the main building blocks  of WEP are present, but corrective measures have been added to address  security problems.</p>
<p>The weaknesses in WEP have been well publicized.  Cracking methods  are now available to comprimise a WEP password in less than 90 seconds.   TKIP&#8217;s improvements are described below.</p>
<p><strong>How WPA improves on WEP</strong><br />
IV values can be reused/IV length is too short. The length of the IV has  been increased from 24bits to 48bits. Rollover of the counter is  eliminated. Reuse of keys is less likely.</p>
<p>In addition IVs are now used as a sequence counter, the TSC (TKIP  Sequence Counter), protecting against replaying of data, a major  vulnerability in WEP.</p>
<p><strong>Weak IV values are susceptible to attack</strong><br />
WPA avoids using known weak IV values. A different secret key is used  for each packet, and the way the key is scrambled with the secret key is  more complex.</p>
<p><strong>Master keys are used directly in WEP</strong><br />
Master Keys are never used directly in WPA. A hierarchy of keys is used,  all derived from the Master. Cryptographically this is a much more  secure practice.</p>
<p><strong>Key Management and updating is poorly provided for in WEP</strong><br />
Secure key management is built-in to WPA, so key management isn&#8217;t an  issue with WPA.</p>
<p><strong>Message integrity checking is ineffective</strong><br />
WEP message integrity proved to be ineffective. WPA uses a Message  Integrity Check (MIC) called, Michael! Due to the hardware constraints  the check has to be relatively simple. In theory there is a one in a  million chance of guessing the correct MIC. In practice any changed  frames would first need to pass the TSC and have the correct packet  encryption key even to reach the point where Micheal comes into  operation. As further security Michael can detect attacks and performs  countermeasures to block new attacks.</p>
<p><strong>Conclusion</strong><br />
WPA (TKIP) is a great solution, providing much stronger security than  WEP, addressing all the weaknesses and allowing compatibility and  upgrades with older equipment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thegeekpub.com/773/why-wpa-is-better-than-wep/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
